<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>achtungbaby.net &#187; web-standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://achtungbaby.net/tag/web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://achtungbaby.net</link>
	<description>Postcards from the Front-End</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Compliant, but not compliant enough</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box model hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peekaboo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitepoint.com recently published a somewhat anti-climatic article espousing the CSS shortcomings of IE7, more than a year after the product was launched, and about two years after IE7&#8242;s beta was released for testing. I can&#8217;t help but feel that some of this frustration aimed at Microsoft is unfair. The developers of IE7 have always stated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standards: You&#8217;ve Got a Long Way to Go, Baby</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web standards?!? We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; web standards! Some startling statistics, according to a study conducted by Rene Saarsoo on web coding practices. He (or his bot rather) combed over a million pages from sites listed in the Open Directory Project and found some disturbing trends: Only 39% of the pages use a valid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XHTML!</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2002/05/23/xhtml/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2002/05/23/xhtml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2002 21:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Useless trivia-that-means-absolutely-nothing-unless-you&#8217;re-bored-and-unemployed: I was retooling my page to make it XHTML-compliant yesterday. What does that mean?Â  Well, according to the World Wide Web Consortium, it&#8217;s because of two reasons&#8230; 1. Document developers and user agent designers are constantly discovering new ways to express their ideas through new markup. In XML, it is relatively easy to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2002/05/23/xhtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->

