<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>achtungbaby.net &#187; CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://achtungbaby.net/tag/css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://achtungbaby.net</link>
	<description>Postcards from the Front-End</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hell freezes over: Internet Explorer 8 passes the Acid test</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the IE blog, Internet Explorer 8 has passed the Acid test.
For those of you unaware, the Acid test is a pretty standardized test given to browsers to determine how compliant they are with W3C standards.  It basically uses funky CSS to expect the browser to properly interpret what should be rendered and how. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compliant, but not compliant enough</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box model hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peekaboo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitepoint.com recently published a somewhat anti-climatic article espousing the CSS shortcomings of IE7, more than a year after the product was launched, and about two years after IE7&#8217;s beta was released for testing.
I can&#8217;t help but feel that some of this frustration aimed at Microsoft is unfair. The developers of IE7 have always stated that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE 5.5 and IE6: AlphaImageLoader Filter</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/26/ie-55-and-ie6-alphaimageloader-filter/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/26/ie-55-and-ie6-alphaimageloader-filter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlphaImageLoader Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[png]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you&#8217;ve been residing under a fairly large rock for the past seven years, you should be well-aware that Internet Explorer 5.5 and 6 do not provide native support for PNG rendering.  To get IE to play nice, you need to apply Microsoft&#8217;s proprietary AlphaImageLoader Filter to the element rendering the PNG while at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/26/ie-55-and-ie6-alphaimageloader-filter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Float clearing for IE7</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/23/float-clearing-for-ie7/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/23/float-clearing-for-ie7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try using { display: inline-block; }:

.clearfix:after {
	content: ".";
	display: block;
	height: 0;
	clear: both;
	visibility: hidden;
}
.clearfix { display: inline-block; }
.clearfix { display: block; }
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/23/float-clearing-for-ie7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preloading Images with CSS</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/08/07/preloading-images-with-css/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/08/07/preloading-images-with-css/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preloading images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nifty way to use CSS to preload images (from specere.net):

#preloadedImages {
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
display: inline;
background-image: url(path/to/image1.png);
background-image: url(path/to/image2.png);
background-image: url(path/to/image3.png);
background-image: url(path/to/image4.png);
background-image: url();
}
#preloadedImages then gets added after body. Especially good for page-specific style sheets.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/08/07/preloading-images-with-css/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standards: You&#8217;ve Got a Long Way to Go, Baby</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web standards?!? We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; web standards!
Some startling statistics, according to a study conducted by Rene Saarsoo on web coding practices. He (or his bot rather) combed over a million pages from sites listed in the Open Directory Project and found some disturbing trends:

Only 39% of the pages use a valid DOCTYPE (how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2006/06/11/standards-youve-got-a-long-way-to-go-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.266 seconds -->
