<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>achtungbaby.net &#187; acid test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://achtungbaby.net/tag/acid-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://achtungbaby.net</link>
	<description>Postcards from the Front-End</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hell freezes over: Internet Explorer 8 passes the Acid test</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the IE blog, Internet Explorer 8 has passed the Acid test. For those of you unaware, the Acid test is a pretty standardized test given to browsers to determine how compliant they are with W3C standards.  It basically uses funky CSS to expect the browser to properly interpret what should be rendered and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compliant, but not compliant enough</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box model hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peekaboo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitepoint.com recently published a somewhat anti-climatic article espousing the CSS shortcomings of IE7, more than a year after the product was launched, and about two years after IE7&#8242;s beta was released for testing. I can&#8217;t help but feel that some of this frustration aimed at Microsoft is unfair. The developers of IE7 have always stated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->

