<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>achtungbaby.net &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://achtungbaby.net/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://achtungbaby.net</link>
	<description>Postcards from the Front-End</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A campaign to believe in</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/03/26/a-campaign-to-believe-in/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/03/26/a-campaign-to-believe-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2008/03/26/a-campaign-to-believe-in/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.savethedevelopers.org/index.php]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/03/26/a-campaign-to-believe-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene.com Relaunch</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/01/25/genecom-relaunch/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/01/25/genecom-relaunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genentech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2008/01/25/genecom-relaunch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over a year in the making, Genentech launched the redesign of their corporate site that I did for them &#8212; http://gene.com]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2008/01/25/genecom-relaunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netscape Browser to Die a Quiet Death in February 2008 &#124; Wired.com</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/31/netscape-browser-to-die-a-quiet-death-in-february-2008-wiredcom/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/31/netscape-browser-to-die-a-quiet-death-in-february-2008-wiredcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/31/netscape-browser-to-die-a-quiet-death-in-february-2008-wiredcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netscape Browser to Die a Quiet Death in February 2008 &#124; Compiler from Wired.com &#8230;though its legacy will continue to live on in Firefox.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/31/netscape-browser-to-die-a-quiet-death-in-february-2008-wiredcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Days, 15 hours, 55 minutes and 41 seconds&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/27/4-days-15-hours-55-minutes-and-41-seconds/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/27/4-days-15-hours-55-minutes-and-41-seconds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trutv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/27/4-days-15-hours-55-minutes-and-41-seconds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;until truTV.com goes live. Will I live to see it?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/27/4-days-15-hours-55-minutes-and-41-seconds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell freezes over: Internet Explorer 8 passes the Acid test</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the IE blog, Internet Explorer 8 has passed the Acid test. For those of you unaware, the Acid test is a pretty standardized test given to browsers to determine how compliant they are with W3C standards.  It basically uses funky CSS to expect the browser to properly interpret what should be rendered and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/19/hell-freezes-over-internet-explorer-8-passes-the-acid-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, a pixel-to-em conversion that works</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/16/finally-an-pixel-to-em-conversion-that-works/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/16/finally-an-pixel-to-em-conversion-that-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pixel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/16/finally-an-pixel-to-em-conversion-that-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long have I yearned for a simple, straightforward way to convert pixels to em&#8217;s, regardless of inheritance issues. Apparently those wise front-end engineers at Yahoo have already figured it out: Width divided by 13 = em&#8217;s for standards-compliant browsers; Em&#8217;s for standards-compliant browsers multiplied by 0.9759 for IE, including IE7 So a 974px width container [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/16/finally-an-pixel-to-em-conversion-that-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE8 looming on the horizon</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/ie8-looming-on-the-horizon/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/ie8-looming-on-the-horizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dixie chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/ie8-looming-on-the-horizon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After spending the last two days engaged in hand-to-hand combat with IE6 &#8211;Â whining and wishing IE6 would just roll over and die &#8212; the folks over at IEblog announce that I IE8 is officially being discussed. I&#8217;m probably a little bit more optimistic than some of the commenters in that post. The amount of animosity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/ie8-looming-on-the-horizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using ifixpng for IE6&#8242;s lack of PNG support</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/using-ifixpng-for-ie6s-lack-of-png-support/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/using-ifixpng-for-ie6s-lack-of-png-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlphaImageLoader Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ifixpng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/using-ifixpng-for-ie6s-lack-of-png-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just discovered this handy plugin the other day: jQuery ifixpng.  I typically use conditional comments  and place all of my AlphaImageLoader nonsense in there so that only IE6 will be served the crazy.  After all, IE7 can understand the filters, and based on my own testing, it doesn&#8217;t seem to like the AlphaImageLoader much (go [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/05/using-ifixpng-for-ie6s-lack-of-png-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Won&#8217;t You Die, IE6?</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/04/why-wont-you-die-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/04/why-wont-you-die-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/04/why-wont-you-die-ie6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s like that scene from Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, when Robin Spitz Swallows gets machine-gunned, fragged, thrown out of a building, and Austin asks incredulously, &#8220;Why won&#8217;t you die?&#8221; It&#8217;s what I&#8217;m asking IE6 right now.  The browser-that-needed-to-die this-year still controls 40% of the browser market share as of November 2007.  40%! What [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/12/04/why-wont-you-die-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compliant, but not compliant enough</title>
		<link>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>achtungbaby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box model hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peekaboo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://achtungbaby.net/archives/174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitepoint.com recently published a somewhat anti-climatic article espousing the CSS shortcomings of IE7, more than a year after the product was launched, and about two years after IE7&#8242;s beta was released for testing. I can&#8217;t help but feel that some of this frustration aimed at Microsoft is unfair. The developers of IE7 have always stated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://achtungbaby.net/2007/11/27/compliant-but-not-compliant-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.365 seconds -->

